Packages in experimental/arm64 which failed to build reproducibly

88 (17.9%) packages which failed to build reproducibly in experimental/arm64:

libgnatcoll libdrumstick linbox fpylll coccinelle check-mk mediagoblin gnutls28 libffi sddm libaws liblog4ada firefox-esr dh-ada-library ros-ros-comm hdf5 opticalraytracer pyotherside wml ezmlm-idx pytest# libreoffice libtexttools libpodofo libtemplates-parser libncursesada libgmpada libxmlezout opentoken vuls dovecot boinc cubew libcec coin3 opencascade linux gdcm libctl librsync okular ffmpeg givaro kopete wsclean dolfin petsc wlroots vtk-dicom criu libflorist poppler wings3d linphone e17 groestlcoin# opencv netpbm-free libminc erlang dogtag-pki# gitaly mpv mpb binutils gdb bash prometheus-alertmanager mapserver openambit syncany gradle webkit2gtk ghc# fonts-cantarell openssl gprbuild upspin librep# openms# vite# configshell libgtkada libaunit libxmlada emacs firefox## singular

A package name displayed with a bold font is an indication that this package has a note. Visited packages are linked in green, those which have not been visited are linked in blue.
A # sign after the name of a package indicates that a bug is filed against it. Likewise, a + sign indicates there is a patch available, a P means a pending bug while # indicates a closed bug. In cases of several bugs, the symbol is repeated.